The June jobs report laid an egg: The US only added roughly half of what economists had forecast — what it means for you
The US economy added just 57,000 jobs in June, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Thursday (1), less than half the 115,000 that economists polled by Dow Jones had penciled in. The unemployment rate ticked down ever so slightly to 4.2% from 4.3% — but not for the reason anyone wants.
The report was pushed up a day early from its usual Friday slot because of the Independence Day holiday. Markets, oddly, cheered the news (2). The Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed about 246 points, or 0.5%, by about 10 a.m. ET, while the S&P 500 added 0.4%. Beaten-down chip stocks bounced. If you’re wondering why a disappointing jobs report would actually boost stocks, a cooling labor market essentially takes pressure off the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates, and cheaper money tends to be good for said stocks.
Must Read
To be clear, payroll growth of 57,000 is anemic by any recent standard, but it’s still roughly in line with the average monthly gain of 36,000 over the past 12 months. The bigger story is buried (3) in the revisions and the participation rate.
The unemployment rate fell for the wrong reason
A falling jobless rate normally signals a healthy market: more people finding work. But that’s not the case this time. The labor force participation rate (4), which measures the share of Americans either working or actively looking, dropped 0.3 percentage points to 61.5%. When people stop searching for a job, they no longer count as unemployed, which mechanically pushes the rate down. The employment-population ratio (5) slipped too, to 59.0%. Fewer people working, fewer people looking (6) — that’s what’s behind the “improvement.”
Revisions told a similar story. The BLS cut April’s gain by 31,000 (to 148,000) and May’s by 43,000 (to 129,000), erasing 74,000 jobs that had previously been reported.
Downward revisions of this size are a classic late-cycle tell: the first estimates flatter the economy, and the truer, weaker number arrives a month or two later. It’s a pattern that dogged the labor market through much of 2024, when repeated revisions steadily chipped away at what looked like solid hiring.
That said, not every sector sagged. Professional and business services led with 36,000 jobs, having added 172,000 since a recent low in October 2025. Social assistance chipped in 25,000, and health care added 22,000, though that was slower than its 38,000 monthly average over the past year.
The clear loser was leisure and hospitality, which shed 61,000 jobs. The BLS blamed it on “weaker than usual seasonal hiring,” but that’s a big ole miss for an industry that typically staffs up heading into summer.
Read More: Almost 50 with no retirement savings? Here’s why you don’t have to panic
Advertisement
What it means for the Fed and your wallet
All of this news is landing on the desk of new Fed chair Kevin Warsh, who took over the central bank in May, succeeding Jerome Powell. President Trump repeatedly attacked Powell during his time as Fed chair for not cutting rates faster.
Warsh was expected to be dovish, but instead, with inflation at a three-year high (7), he’s leaned hawkish. At his first meeting in June, the FOMC voted unanimously (8) to hold the federal funds rate at 3.50% to 3.75% — its level since the last cut in December 2025 — but the committee’s “dot plot” (9) showed most members leaning toward hikes this year rather than cuts.
After the data in this soft jobs report, the two-year Treasury yield — the maturity most sensitive to Fed policy — fell (2), and traders read the print as easing near-term pressure to hike. The next decision comes at the July 28–29 FOMC meeting (10), which will be Warsh’s second as chair.
The catch for households is that a cooler labor market hasn’t brought any kind of relief on prices. Average hourly earnings rose 0.3% in June to $37.64, up 3.5% over the year. But May inflation ran at 4.2% (11), the biggest annual increase since April 2023, lifted largely by energy costs tied to the Iran conflict. For the second straight month (7), prices outpaced paychecks, meaning workers’ real wages shrank even as the headline says they got a raise.
Warsh, for his part, has left little doubt about where his focus sits. This week, at a central banking forum in Portugal, he said (12): “We’ve all looked around, and we’ve seen that prices are too high.”
What To Read Next
-
Robert Kiyosaki issues grim warning for baby boomers. Many could be ‘wiped out’ and homeless ‘all over’ the country. How to protect yourself now
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Article Sources
We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see ourethics and guidelines.
Bls (1), (3); Cnbc (2), (11); Fred Stlouisfed (4), (5); Cepr (6); Npr (7); Chase (8); Federalreserve (9), (10); Finance Yahoo (12)
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.