PRIM vs mutual funds vs PMS: What’s different, and what should investors know?
The choice between the three should ultimately depend on what the investor wants from professional management
In a mutual fund, capital gains generally arise when an investor redeems or switches units
For affluent investors, choosing between mutual funds and portfolio management services (PMS) has traditionally come down to a trade-off between accessibility and customisation. The introduction of the Portfolio Managers Route for Investing in Mutual Fund Units (PRIM) adds a third option to the mix.
With a minimum investment of Rs 25 lakh, PRIM lowers the entry threshold compared with PMS, where the minimum investment is Rs 50 lakh. But the difference is not just about the ticket size. The three routes vary in how portfolios are constructed, what investors own, how managers are paid and how transactions are taxed.
“The market regulator SEBI has always looked into aspects where investors get access to best possible services at the lowest cost. The introduction of PRIM will open up new avenues of investing and encourage incremental participation from individuals who were still shying away from the equity markets due to lack of proper access or may be advise in asset allocation,” said Siddharth Purohit Fund Manager- Equity InvestValue Capital.
The biggest distinction is what the portfolio manager actually manages.
Under PMS, the manager directly manages securities for the investor. The portfolio can include large-, mid- and small-cap stocks and can be relatively concentrated depending on the investment strategy.
Mutual funds work differently. Investors buy units of a pooled scheme, while the fund manager manages the underlying securities according to the scheme mandate. Depending on the scheme, this could mean exposure to large-cap, mid-cap, small-cap or flexi-cap stocks, bonds or other permitted assets.
PRIM takes a different route. Instead of directly picking stocks for the investor, the portfolio manager constructs a portfolio using eligible mutual fund products, including direct mutual fund plans, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), index funds and specified investment funds (SIFs).
Ticket size is only the starting point
The minimum investment makes PRIM more accessible than PMS for affluent investors. PMS requires at least Rs 50 lakh, while PRIM starts at Rs 25 lakh. Mutual funds have a substantially lower entry point, with minimum investments varying across schemes.
But investors should not view PRIM simply as a cheaper version of PMS. In PMS, the manager has direct control over the securities in the portfolio. In PRIM, the manager decides which eligible funds to hold and how much to allocate to each. The underlying fund managers continue to manage the securities within those funds.
That makes PRIM more of a professionally managed asset-allocation route than a direct-stock portfolio.
“Each PMS approach is tagged to one strategy (equity, debt, hybrid, multi-asset). APMI sets up to three benchmarks per strategy; the manager picks one. Returns are time-weighted and net of all fees and expenses. A benchmark change requires a load-free exit offer and ends use of the old track record. PRIM benchmarking is not yet specified; the fair test is net return against a low-cost index mix with the same allocation,” said Shobhit Mathur, Co-Founder at Ionic Wealth.
Fees need a closer look
The fee structure is another major difference. PMS managers can charge a fixed fee, a performance-linked fee or both, depending on the agreement with the client. Operating expenses and other charges are governed by the applicable regulatory framework.
Mutual funds, meanwhile, charge investors through the scheme’s expense ratio, subject to regulatory limits. There is no separately negotiated portfolio-management fee for the individual investor.
Under PRIM, the portfolio manager can charge a fixed management fee of up to 1 percent of client assets, while performance fees are permitted. Importantly, the investor can also bear the expenses of the underlying mutual fund products.
So, comparing only the manager fee can be misleading. Investors need to look at the total cost of the portfolio, including underlying fund expenses and other applicable charges.
Tax treatment is not the same
In a mutual fund, capital gains generally arise when an investor redeems or switches units. In PMS, the manager buys and sells securities in the investor’s portfolio. Individual transactions can therefore create capital gains tax implications for the investor. PRIM involves investments in underlying mutual fund products. As a result, switches or redemptions within the portfolio can also have tax consequences for the investor. The tax treatment should therefore be considered alongside returns and costs rather than as an afterthought.
What about overseas investments?
The three structures also differ in how they provide overseas exposure. The revised PMS framework permits overseas investments, subject to applicable FEMA, LRS and other regulatory requirements. Mutual funds can offer overseas exposure through eligible international schemes and funds, subject to applicable regulatory limits. It includes listed equity, listed debt, overseas funds and listed REITs, ETFs, index funds and foreign government debt
PRIM, however, is built around eligible Indian mutual fund products. It does not give the portfolio manager the same ability as PMS to directly construct a portfolio of overseas securities.
What should investors know?
The choice between the three should ultimately depend on what the investor wants from professional management. Experts say PMS may suit investors seeking direct ownership and greater portfolio customisation. Mutual funds remain the simplest and most accessible route for investors who are comfortable choosing a scheme and investing in a pooled portfolio.
PRIM sits between the two: It brings professional portfolio construction to a Rs 25 lakh entry point, but the portfolio manager works through mutual fund products rather than directly selecting individual securities.
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by experts on Moneycontrol.com are their own and not those of the website or its management. Moneycontrol.com advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.