Trade War? Tariffs? How a Trump Election Would Change Tech
The Gist
- Apple’s vulnerability. Trump’s tariffs could heavily impact Apple, pressuring the company to move more production to the U.S.
- Semiconductor resilience. Both political parties align on tariffs to protect U.S. semiconductor access, crucial for tech production.
- Ecommerce shift. Chinese ecommerce giants like Shein and Temu may face higher tariffs or bans, impacting U.S. ecommerce dynamics.
The tech industry is dependent on global trade. Semiconductors, phones and items in ecommerce shops typically cross borders before reaching their destinations. And when the global supply chain is mostly functional, it keeps inflation down, boosting a stock market that’s delivered outsized gains for big tech.
But this system’s stability is now uncertain with the U.S. presidential election here tomorrow. Both candidates are more protectionist than the free trade consensus that’s held for the past two decades. But Donald Trump is on another level. The former President could “radically remake world trade,” the WSJ recently said, with tariffs of 20% on all imports, and potentially 60% on imports from China.
“Tariff,” Trump said last month, “is the most beautiful word in the dictionary. More beautiful than love, more beautiful than respect.”
Should Trump win, global trade will likely become tech’s top issue, a policy matter unlike the social media manipulation stories that followed previous elections. Here’s a realistic picture of what might unfold after the election, based on interviews with trade experts studying the policies:
Apple’s Unique Vulnerability in a Trade War
Apple is the U.S. tech company most interlinked with China, with 20% of its revenue and critical manufacturing capabilities based in the country. Apple avoided meaningful damage from Trump’s tariffs during his term thanks to exemptions and exclusions for products like the iPhone, iPad, MacBook and Apple Watch. But this time, everything appears to be on the table.
“The transitions are likely to be quite severe,” said Warwick Mckibbin, an economics professor and co-author of a recent study on Trump’s proposals by the non-partisan Peterson Institute for International Economics. “Take an Apple iPhone, for example. That’s being assembled in different places and going through multiple processes, it’s going to be very disruptive in the short term. In a long-term, it’s going to mean higher costs.”
Such near-term concerns could hit Apple stock fairly quickly, Hightower Advisors’ chief investment strategist Stephanie Link told me on Big Technology Podcast last month. “The initial knee-jerk reaction will be sell Apple,” she said.
But Apple has a powerful lobbying arm, and Tim Cook himself has successfully convinced Trump to exempt Apple in the past, so there’s a chance it could strike a deal again. “The targeting of tariffs isn’t always principled,” Ajay Mehrotra, professor at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, told me. “Tax policy and international trade policy are susceptible to lobbying.”
Finally, Trump often uses threats of tariffs as a negotiating tactic, working to cajole companies to manufacture in the U.S. or face import duties. He may well attempt to get Apple to relocate more of its supply chain to U.S. in exchange for more exemptions.
Related Article: Apple + OpenAI Math: Notebook From a Week in Silicon Valley
Impact on Semiconductor Supply and Pricing
The U.S. relies on Taiwan for semiconductors — the critical component in most electronics — and it’s already planning to double its 25% tariff on semis to 50% by 2025. That tariff hike is a Biden administration plan, so Kamala Harris and Trump might not differ much on this issue, a rare area of common ground.
“On a bipartisan basis, there has been a focus on semiconductors, on U.S. access, on U.S. production,” Greta Peisch, the former general counsel for the U.S. trade ambassador under Biden, and currently a trade attorney at Wiley Rein, told me. “You would probably see some consistency.”
For semiconductors, the fear is a trade war spills over with unintended consequences, making it harder for U.S. companies to get the component. But all actors have incentives to keep the situation from going nuclear, Peisch said.
Ecommerce Giants and Chinese Imports
Companies like Amazon depend on goods made in China, and Chinese upstarts Shein and Temu have made inroads worldwide. In the U.S. the latter two are using a “de minimis” exemption in trade law that allows directly-mailed goods to come in tax free if they’re less than $800 per person, per day. The Biden administration has pushed to close this loophole in some areas, and Trump would almost certainly attack it should he take office again.
“My hunch is that the path towards closing the exemption has been taken,” Amit Khandelwal, professor of global affairs and economics at Yale University, told me. “And my hunch is that if a Democratic administration comes, we will just follow down that path. If a Republican administration comes, I guess the elimination of that part of de minimis exemption that they’ve done already would be the baseline. And there would be discussions to do more.”
Should the loophole close, Shein and Temu will likely see broad price increases, and this has already played out to some degree outside the U.S. “In Europe, it’s already a 20% tax and there’s no de minimis,” Chad Schofield, co-founder & chief digital officer at logistics company BoxC, told me. “Of course, no one wants to pay extra tax, but it’s not a death blow.”
Trump, who attempted to ban TikTok as President, may decide tariffs are not enough and attempt to ban Shein and Temu. Certainly, Amazon, which has come under some threat from these companies, wouldn’t mind.
Conclusion: The Potential Impact of a Trump Victory on Tech Trade
Many economists I speak with are enthusiastically pro-free trade while those in government seem warmer to protectionism. It makes some sense. While globalized trade has grown the broader pie, it’s also left many back.
And tariffs — along with the threat threats of tariffs — are seen as one way to mitigate the downsides. There are, however, various potential secondary consequences to such moves, and they’re not guaranteed to work. If the election goes Trump’s way this week, though, the tech industry is going to be thrust right in the middle of this conversation.