This Social Security Change Will Happen for the Last Time in 2026
A big change is coming to Social Security next year, but it is not a change that will repeat again in the future unless lawmakers change the rules.
Changes to Social Security are a fact of life, even when lawmakers do not take action to modify the retirement benefits program. Some automatic modifications are built into Social Security retirement and disability benefits each year in order to make sure that benefits keep working to provide a reasonable amount of income for retirees and the disabled.
One change, however, has been happening every year but will happen for the last time in 2026. Retirees should actually be very glad that this is the last year that this rule will change, as the updates that have been occurring have made life a little harder for older Americans.
Here are the details about the Social Security change that is happening for the last time in 2026.
2026 is the last time this rule will change unless lawmakers make changes
For many years, the rules for Social Security have changed as each new year has arrived. Specifically, one very important shift has occurred: The age at which you can collect your full Social Security benefits has been moving later.
Image source: Getty Images.
Traditionally, full retirement age (FRA) was the same for everyone, and all retirees had to wait to claim Social Security until they were 65. That changed due to reforms in 1983, though. In the 1980s, lawmakers decided that the full retirement age had to move later in order to shore up the finances of the Social Security benefits program.
The change to FRA has been phased in gradually, and people knew when their FRA was. Changes were not made on the fly. But each year, people turning retirement age had to wait a little longer until they could claim their standard, unreduced benefit.
Specifically, those born in 1959 who turned 66 this year had to wait until 66 and 10 months to claim benefits, while those born in 1958 who turned 66 last year only had to wait until 66 and 8 months. Before that:
- Those born in 1957 had to wait until 66 and 6 months.
- Those born in 1956 had to wait until 66 and 4 months.
- Those born in 1955 had to wait until 66 and 2 months.
- Those born between 1943 and 1954 had to wait until age 66.
Only people born before 1943 got to claim at the previously standard age of 65. So, for many years, every new group that aged into the system has had a slightly longer delay before they could start their Social Security checks. This has meant either waiting longer to start benefits, accepting a reduced benefit, or relying on distributions from retirement plans to provide income while waiting for Social Security to begin.
Social Security’s full retirement age is changing again in 2026, so this pattern will continue. Anyone who is turning 66 next year will have to wait until they are 67 to start claiming Social Security. This is the first time that FRA has been pushed back into a whole new age range and out of the year when seniors turn 66.
The good news is, it’s also the last time FRA will change within the current system’s rules. For anyone born in 1960 or later, FRA is going to remain at 67 unless lawmakers make modifications to the program.
Why are future retirees better off now that this change is no longer occurring?
It’s great news for future retirees that the age to claim full Social Security benefits is not going to move later after next year.
That’s because each time FRA has moved later, retirees have faced a de facto benefit cut, either having to wait longer to start benefits or facing a lifetime reduction in income that could leave them more reliant on their 401(k) or other income sources.
The fact that FRA will remain stable — as long as lawmakers don’t make changes — will make retirement planning easier, as all future retirees will know that 67 is the milestone they must reach to receive their standard benefit. This will remain the case without a major change to the law, which isn’t necessarily off the table, but which would be pretty unpopular, as there’s a lot of opposition to altering the full retirement age in future Social Security reforms.