Should You Claim Social Security at 62? Here's What The Math Really Says
Age 62 is the earliest you’re allowed to sign up for Social Security benefits. And it can be very tempting to start getting that money as soon as it becomes available.
However, you should know that claiming Social Security at 62 will generally mean reducing your monthly checks substantially, and on a permanent basis. Those smaller payments could end up being a problem if your retirement plan isn’t enough, leaving you with just Social Security to live on.
Let’s review the math behind claiming Social Security benefits at 62 to see if it’s the right choice for you.
Find Out: 14 benefits seniors are entitled to but often forget to claim
What claiming benefits at 62 does to your Social Security checks
The impact of claiming Social Security benefits at 62 may be more significant than you’d expect. If you were born in 1960 or later and your full retirement age is 67, filing at 62 reduces your monthly checks by 30%.
Here’s what that means in practice. Let’s say you’re eligible for $2,000 a month in Social Security at age 67. If you file at 62, you’ll shrink your monthly checks down to $1,400.
That extra $600 per month will generally be gone forever (though there is an option to undo your claim and reapply later). On a yearly basis, you’re looking at $7,200 less in this example.
And don’t forget that the smaller a benefit you start out with, the smaller your annual Social Security cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) are apt to be. In 2026, benefits got a 2.8% COLA. For a $2,000 benefit, a 2.8% raise amounts to $56. For a $1,400 benefit, it’s only about $39.
Who really has the cheapest auto insurance in your area? Check your zip code here.
The math could work out in your favor
You’ll often hear that filing for Social Security at 62 is a dangerous move because it typically reduces your monthly checks on a permanent basis. But that doesn’t mean you won’t get a larger lifetime benefit.
To see if an early claim makes sense for you, it’s important to calculate your breakeven age. This is the age where you get the same lifetime benefit by filing sooner versus later (in this case, 62 versus 67).
In our example, your breakeven age is 78.67 years old. At that point, you’re looking at about $280,000 in lifetime income, whether you claim benefits at 62 versus 67.
Advertisement
What this means is that if you live past 78.67, you’ll get more lifetime income out of Social Security by waiting until 67 to claim benefits. If you pass away before 78.67, you’ll get more lifetime income by filing earlier.
In other words, your life expectancy needs to play a role in your filing decision. Once you’ve calculated your breakeven age, you need to ask yourself whether you’re likely to live past it or pass away sooner. And while you may not know the answer with certainty, your health and family history should be big clues.
When it pays to claim Social Security early
Since there are serious financial consequences to claiming Social Security at 62, it’s important to make sure it’s a good idea. But in some cases, it is.
If you have poor health, that could make the case for an early claim. Just keep in mind that chronic issues don’t always mean a shortened lifespan. It’s a good idea to discuss your situation with a trusted medical provider to see what sort of life expectancy you may be looking at.
Along these lines, if your parents and grandparents all passed away at fairly young ages, you may be genetically predisposed to a similar fate. That, too, makes the argument for claiming benefits at 62.
Also, if you have a job that’s physically or mentally demanding, staying at it could be harmful to your health once you reach a certain age. If claiming Social Security early allows you to escape that situation, it may be worth getting smaller monthly benefits for life.
You may also find yourself in a situation where you’re out of work at age 62 and can’t find a new job. If you have no other income, claiming Social Security may be your only option. It’s also generally a more favorable option than racking up debt in your 60s.
Keep in mind that if you’re married, the decision to claim Social Security at 62 gets trickier. You may have poor health that makes you likely to pass away in your early 70s. But if you also have a much younger spouse in great health who’s likely to outlive you, and you’re the higher earner in your household, it could pay to claim Social Security at full retirement age. Doing so could leave your spouse with a much higher survivor benefit for the rest of their life, while claiming your own benefits at 62 could result in a much smaller survivor benefit.
Bottom line
Claiming Social Security at 62 may reduce your monthly benefits, but that doesn’t make it a bad idea off the bat. Depending on how long you live, you could end up with more total income from Social Security despite reducing your payments on a monthly basis.
As you go about this important decision, you may want to use the Social Security Administration’s various calculators to understand the consequences of filing at different ages. It’s also a good idea to consult a financial advisor who can help you make that choice based on your health, marital status, income, spending needs, and retirement goals.
More from FinanceBuzz: