Trump will inherit the strongest economy in 50 years. Project 2025 could destroy it. | Opinion

President-elect Donald Trump will inherit what I consider the strongest domestic economy in 50 years. Job growth, wage growth and GDP growth are all strong, and inflation has returned to its normal plodding path. We could be in the midst of a long expansion.

It is not hard to gauge the policy choices Trump will prefer. Project 2025, of which I’ve written, will tell us what we need to know about economic and fiscal policy. It is a detailed road map and will animate much of what happens in the executive branch over the coming years. Much, but not all, of Project 2025 will require compliance in the House and Senate. That seems unlikely, at least until the next election.

Project 2025 tells us to expect a big expansion in political appointees to civil service, from 4,000 to 20,000, which appears to be possible without the support of Congress. With that, we’ll see efforts to pressure states to expand universal school vouchers, reduce environmental regulation and expand energy production on federal lands.

Much of this won’t come to pass, because it falls to the purview of state governments or will be tied up in courts for years. Like these changes or not, don’t expect them all in four years.

This, of course, depends upon the next administration’s compliance with the Constitution, a dubious proposition to be sure.

Trump can’t carry out Project 2025 alone

Project 2025 also contains varied proposals that would reverse benefits to veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, restrict access to abortion-related medications, abolish the Department of Education and link federal classroom funding to schools that follow approved curriculum.

Almost all of Project 2025 builds a bigger, more expansive and intrusive federal government. Most of it comes from legislation to expand socially conservative ideas, using the strong arm of government. We should expect much more of that from this administration.

The U.S. economy won’t be much affected by the slow changes to these sorts of policies and the tough political fights they entail. Nothing in Project 2025 wrestles with the real fiscal challenges – debt, taxes and entitlement spending. Nor does Trump have a plan to deal with public debt. As with his first term, we should expect public debt to grow substantially in his second.

Opinion: Harris is wrong about Project 2025. Our plan is good for America.

There’s also been a flurry of statements on the campaign trail that offer more immediate risk to the economy. Trump has spoken disapprovingly of an independent Federal Reserve. That would take a compliant Congress, which he won’t have, but the appointment of a different Board of Governors and chairman could vastly reduce its independence.

Trump’s plans for deportation, the economy will cost Americans

Trump has promised the mass deportation of illegal immigrants. Illegal immigration in the United States is down from its 2007 high of 12.2 million persons to about 11 million today. Absent misleading claims, the challenge of illegal immigration is lessening over time.

The costs of deportation are huge. Bus and rail costs for voluntary deportation would run well over $50 billion and take well over a year. We simply don’t have the buses in the United States to move 11 million people to, say, Mexico in a year. Moreover, the cost of mobilizing tens of thousands of National Guard troops to aid in deportation would be well over a half-trillion dollars.

Deportation and mobilization would also remove millions of workers from an economy already starved for workers. This would spike the deficit, because undocumented immigrants pay much more in taxes than they receive in services. It would also slow economic growth.

On this issue, expect much of what Trump has shown a propensity for – bold claims and little action.

Opinion: Trump’s win terrifies my Latino students. I’m struggling to reassure them.

Trump has also claimed he would expand tariffs, perhaps dramatically. Here, Congress has given the president enormous latitude in setting tariffs for national security claims. Presidents from both parties have abused this power, so Trump will be able to levy virtually whatever tariff he wishes, on whomever he wishes.

The tariffs are purportedly designed to increase U.S. manufacturing employment. One key problem with that claim is that there’s overwhelming evidence that tariffs reduce domestic factory employment. Indeed, Trump’s 2018 tariffs pushed the Midwest – whose factories were especially susceptible to tariffs – into the brink of recession in 2019.

Today, factory employment in the Midwest is below the January 2017 levels when Trump first took office.

A 10-20% tariff on all imported goods, as Trump proposes, could push the United States into recession. Prices on all manufactured goods would rise, and we would expect retaliatory tariffs to likewise reduce demand for U.S. goods and services abroad. This is a hard lesson to relearn, but we appear a hardheaded people.

America’s economy stands on our reputation

It must be said that many of Vice President Kamala Harris’ economic proposals were also unhelpful to long-term economic growth. Her tariffs were more modest, but still shortsighted and counterproductive.

The Democrats also lacked an effective plan for debt reduction and hold ridiculously optimistic views of their place-based economic development programs.

Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don’t have the app? Download it for free from your app store.

But there was one big difference between the 2024 presidential nominees.

The U.S. economy has dominated the world for most of the past century and continues to do so today. Over that time, we’ve endured a lot of very bad economic policies, but continued to thrive.

Our twin pillars of strength lie in our national reputation in two areas: First, we are a magnet for attracting and creating human capital – educated people with skills, drive and entrepreneurial talent. Second, we abide by the rule of law in the conduct of our elected officials, commerce and international affairs.

Trump’s policies deeply risk the first of these, in making the United States an unwelcoming and risky place for foreign nationals. Trump’s conduct while in and outside of office makes mockery of the rule of law. If his lawlessness continues, as we must expect, a weakened and poorly performing economy will be among the least of our concerns.

Michael J. Hicks, director of the Center for Business and Economic Research, is the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. This column first appeared in the Indianapolis Star.

You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.

This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Trump’s win means Project 2025. Can our economy survive? | Opinion