Warren Buffett vs. Michael Saylor: Who Made the Better Investment This Quarter

• Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) amassed $381.7B in cash during Q3 with $306B parked in Treasury bills yielding 4.2% annually.

• MicroStrategy (MSTR) acquired 42,706 Bitcoin at $116K per coin for $4.5B and now holds over 640,000 total.

• Bitcoin rose 16% in Q3 while Treasury bills returned 1% and Berkshire stock gained 3.5%.

• Some investors get rich while others struggle because they never learned there are two completely different strategies to building wealth. Don’t make the same mistake, learn about both here.

Warren Buffett and Michael Saylor represent two starkly different investment philosophies in the market. Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway‘s (NYSE:BRK-A)(NYSE:BRK-B) legendary Oracle of Omaha, favors safe, liquid assets like U.S. Treasury bills to preserve capital for future opportunities in undervalued stocks. In contrast, Saylor, executive chairman of Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR), bets aggressively on Bitcoin (CRYPTO:BTC) as a hedge against inflation and a superior store of value.

This divergence highlights a broader debate between traditional finance’s caution and crypto’s high-risk growth potential. With economic uncertainty persisting, both investors made massive bets in the third quarter on their preferred asset. Who made the better investment decision?

In Q3, Berkshire Hathaway amassed a record cash hoard of $381.7 billion, primarily in short-term U.S. Treasury bills. The company net purchased $183 billion in T-bills during the quarter, boosting its total holdings to $306 billion in these instruments alone. This move reflects Buffett’s strategy of parking capital safely amid high valuations in equities, waiting for attractive acquisitions or buybacks.

Meanwhile, Strategy continued its Bitcoin accumulation, acquiring 42,706 BTC at an estimated average price of $116,000 per coin, for a total value of about $4.5 billion. This brought the firm’s holdings to over 640,000 bitcoin at the end of the period, aligning with Saylor’s view of Bitcoin as “digital gold” to protect against currency debasement.

T-bills provided Buffett with stability but modest returns. With average yields around 4.2% annually, they delivered roughly 1% in Q3, underperforming the S&P 500‘s 8% gain. Adjusted for inflation at about 3%, T-bills offered a slim positive real return of 1.2%. Berkshire Hathaway stock rose 3.5% during the quarter.

Bitcoin, however, was on the move higher, rising 16% in the quarter amid market and economic uncertainty. This was twice the S&P 500’s performance and handily outpaced T-bills. Strategy’s stock, although closely aligned with Bitcoin, does not walk lockstep with it, which was reflected in its greater than 20% decline for Q3. Strategy’s  enterprise value also declined during this period, falling almost 15% to $106.5 billion compared to $124.6 billion at the start.

It is important to note that Buffett’s cash position isn’t meant for permanent holding; it’s a war chest for deploying into stocks during downturns. Berkshire’s long-term track record supports this — since 1965, it has generated a 19.9% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), outpacing the S&P 500’s 10.4% CAGR over the same period.

Recent years show a slower 13.9% CAGR over the past decade, but Buffett’s discipline has historically turned cash into compounding machines like Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) or insurance operations.

Bitcoin’s outlook is more speculative. Its historical CAGR exceeds 86% over the past 10 years, driven by adoption and scarcity. Projections suggest a 20% to 30% CAGR through 2030 as institutional demand grows, potentially outstripping T-bills’ erosion from inflation.

However, volatility remains a risk — Bitcoin’s drawdowns can exceed 70% and its price is 25% below the all-time high hit in early October. Critics argue T-bills could lose real value if M2 money supply growth hits 6% and inflation follows, but current 4.5% M2 growth and 3% inflation keep them viable short-term. Buffett’s eventual deployment could amplify returns, unlike Saylor’s all-in Bitcoin stance.

Although crypto advocates will likely disagree, Buffett made the better investment choice, especially for risk-averse investors. His cash hoard preserves optionality in an overvalued market, backed by Berkshire’s proven long-term outperformance.

Saylor’s Bitcoin play offers explosive upside opportunity but exposes holders to crypto’s swings. In a low-inflation environment, T-bills hold steady, while Bitcoin’s edge depends on a sustained growth narrative.