Claiming Social Security at 62 Isn't Always a Disaster – Here's When It Actually Makes Sense

Delaying Social Security generally produces a larger guaranteed monthly benefit.
So, why wouldn’t everyone follow this retirement rule of thumb?

It turns out that in some cases, the “wait as long as possible” strategy isn’t
always the best. Here’s when to consider more than just the size of your senior benefits
and how to know the right age to retire for your unique needs.

Find Out: 13 moves seniors could benefit from but often forget about.

What you’re giving up at 62

Waiting can really pay off. If, for example, your benefit at full retirement age
(FRA) would be $2,000, retiring at 62 would drop the payment down to around
$1,400 a month. Waiting until age 70, on the other hand, would have raised that
benefit to around $2,480 a month. This is due to delayed retirement credits that
you accumulate after the FRA — although it caps out at age 70.

An early claim is not a temporary discount that later catches up at full
retirement age. It’s a permanent, up to 30% reduction that applies to your
monthly retirement benefit for the rest of your life.

Shopping for cheaper auto insurance? Enter your zip code here to get started.

What about inflation?

Yes, you’ll get cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) from time to time to boost
your retirement benefit payment and help with inflation costs. These raises
average around 3% and don’t always account for the true cost of Medicare
premiums, rising rents, or other expenses not figured into the COLA formula.

That’s why if a Social Security payment isn’t quite enough when you retire, it
isn’t likely to keep up with new added expenses (like health care or rising
property taxes) over time. Claiming at 62 can still make sense for some people,
however, especially if any of the following ring true.

Your essentials are covered

If you need Social Security to pay rent, utilities, groceries, or insurance, you
likely can’t delay it. But those who choose to claim early when essentials are
already covered by savings, pensions, or part-time work have a different
motivation.

The strategy here is to use the benefit to travel, pursue hobbies, visit family,
or ease into retirement without putting all the burden on an investment
portfolio. In this case, Social Security isn’t only a longevity hedge; it’s also
a source of flexible cash for meaningful memories while you’re young enough to
make them.

Save Money: Things to cut when living on retirement (many people ignore #11)

Health and life expectancy change the math

A history of family illness, previous diagnoses, or a serious recent health
decline can all point to a shorter-than-average lifespan for some people. It’s
not pleasant to think about getting your Social Security payout upfront for
these reasons. But if you don’t see living long enough to get value from larger,
delayed payments, it might be the right move.

This concept of a “break-even age” is where the total value of smaller early
checks and larger, delayed payments becomes the same. The Social Security
Administration (SSA) has a life expectancy calculator to make the math more
concrete. However, it’s just one planning tool to consider and not a prediction.

Social Security is inflation-adjusted, and no one truly knows how long they have
left.

You must retire early

Some retirees make their decision to stop working out of necessity, not a desire
to travel or take up hobbies. In this case, they no longer get employment income
and may need Social Security benefits to fill in the gaps. This is more common
for those in physically demanding jobs, who need to care for a spouse, or who
have difficulty finding work in their chosen field.

Social Security at age 62 is truly a bridge and reduces the amount someone needs
to withdraw from savings or retirement accounts. Note that if you’re younger
than full retirement age (which is 66 to 67, depending on your birth year) and
continue working, SSA may withhold benefits when earnings exceed the annual
limit. It’s not lost forever and will become part of the benefit payments at
FRA.

Your spouse isn’t as dependent on your benefits

Claiming early can be more consequential for higher earners in a married
household, because a surviving spouse may be able to receive a survivor benefit
based on the deceased’s benefit record. If the higher earner delays, it can
function as protection for the spouse who may outlive them.

This isn’t to say that claiming your own retirement benefit early automatically
ruins every potential survivor benefit. If you’re the lower earner, the
survivor-benefit implications of your own claiming decision may be less
significant — but you should still compare your own retirement benefit, your
spouse’s benefit, and likely survivor benefits before claiming. 

The key is to
not treat two individual claiming decisions as separate, since a spouse’s
decision can ultimately affect how much the other has to live on.

Retire like the rich: 14 ways you could build wealth in your 50s.

Bottom line

Filing at 62 means a smaller monthly benefit for as long as you receive it,
which can affect your spouse. For those who need to retire early, plan on living on just
Social Security, or who need to fill in gaps from a forced workforce exit,
early claiming can make sense.

The best age is personal, not universal. But be sure to consider your options
well before filing, as Social Security allows a narrow do-over option. If you
change your mind, benefits need to be returned, which may be inconvenient,
costly, and an unnecessary part of retiring well.

More from FinanceBuzz: