SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF vs. iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF: Higher Interest Rates Are Exposing a Critical Difference for 2027

For investors seeking exposure to the banking sector, the State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE -0.49%) and the iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT -0.28%) are notable candidates.

Both funds offer exposure to a sector closely tied to the health of the U.S. economy and the direction of interest rates. However, their contrasting approaches to diversification could lead to different outcomes as banks navigate a changing rate environment. Here’s how the two ETFs compare in terms of performance, income potential, and risk heading into 2027.

Snapshot (cost & size)

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF is the slightly more affordable option with an expense ratio of 0.35%. However, income-focused investors may prefer iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF, which offers a higher distribution yield and a payout gap of 0.67 percentage points over the last 12 months.

Performance & risk comparison

What’s inside

State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF tracks the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index, providing exposure to 167 holdings across the financial services sector. Its largest positions include Eastern Bankshares, Inc. (EBC -1.07%) at 1.19%, Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI -0.59%) at 1.19%, and United Community Banks (UCB -0.13%) at 1.18%. Because it uses a modified equal-weighted index, it avoids the heavy concentration found in market-cap-weighted peers and spreads risk across many more institutions. This sampling technique allows the fund to capture the performance of small and mid-sized lenders that are often overlooked by broader financial indexes. The fund was launched in 2006 and has paid $1.61 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$73.73 share price works out to a 2.2% yield.

iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF takes a more focused approach, holding 30 stocks in the regional and diversified banking industries. Its largest positions include US Bancorp (USB -0.33%) at 15.12%, PNC Financial Services Group (PNC +0.00%) at 14.69%, and Truist Financial (TFC -0.14%) at 9.79%. This top-heavy structure means a handful of the country’s biggest regional banks dictate the majority of the fund price movement. As a result, investors in this fund are making a more targeted bet on the stability and growth of the sector’s most established dominant players. The fund was launched in 2006 and has paid $1.64 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$60.91 share price works out to a 2.87% yield.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

Which looks like the better buy

Higher interest rates present a mixed outlook for regional banks heading into 2027. While elevated lending rates can support interest income, rising deposit costs, tighter credit conditions, and potential loan losses could pressure profitability. The Federal Reserve’s next moves will be critical, particularly for smaller lenders with greater sensitivity to local economic conditions.

Against this backdrop, the iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF looks like the better buy. Its concentration in larger, more established institutions provides exposure to banks with generally broader deposit franchises, more diversified revenue streams, and greater resources to navigate prolonged economic uncertainty. The fund also offers a higher dividend yield, making it attractive to income-oriented investors.

The State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF offers broader diversification and greater exposure to smaller banks, which could outperform if lending accelerates and financial conditions improve. However, with interest rates remaining elevated and credit risks still a concern, I favor the iShares fund’s emphasis on larger institutions as the new year approaches.