Wall Street sex scandal case goes to federal court
(NewsNation) — The lawsuit at the center of the so-called Wall Street sex scandal is moving from state court to federal court, a shift that legal analysts say could reshape the high-profile legal battle between a former JPMorgan employee and a bank executive he accused of sexual misconduct.
A judge recently ruled that the case can proceed in federal court, a move trial attorney Rich Schoenstein said may benefit plaintiff Chirayu Rana, who alleges JPMorgan executive Lorna Hajdini sexually assaulted him and treated him as her “sex slave.”
Hajdini has denied the allegations and separately sued Rana for defamation.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Attorneys claim new evidence in Wall Street sex scandal
Why the case is moving to federal court
According to Schoenstein, Rana’s legal team sought to dismiss the state court case so they could refile in federal court.
“I like federal court better for the most part, for a lot of reasons. But mainly, Rana wanted to get away from this state court judge,” Schoenstein told NewsNation’s “Jesse Weber Live.” “The ruling so far had not really been in his favor, except, oddly enough for this ruling right now, letting him out of the case and giving him some compensation for attorney’s fees.”
JP Morgan Chase investment banker Lorna Hajdini and Chirayu Rana, who accused her of making him her “sex slave.” (LinkedIn)
Rana’s attorneys filed a motion to dismiss without prejudice, allowing him to pursue his claims in a different venue without permanently closing the case.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Schoenstein said federal court is generally viewed as a more favorable venue for complex civil litigation. He also suggested Rana may have wanted to distance himself from the state court judge overseeing the case.
Discovery rules could benefit Hajdini
While the venue change may help Rana, Schoenstein noted that federal court could also create new challenges for the plaintiff.
One key issue involves witness disclosures.
Under federal discovery rules, Rana may have to provide the defense with the identities of witnesses previously shielded from public view.
“He’s going to have to tell them now, and now they’re going to know who the witnesses are,” Schoenstein said. “Which is something basic you have to reveal in all civil cases.”
Separate lawsuits will proceed in different courts
Complicating matters further, Hajdini’s defamation lawsuit against Rana will remain in state court.
Advertisement
Advertisement
That means both sides could be litigating related claims in two separate court systems at the same time.
Weekend sees temporary wildfire smoke relief in some cities
“Her strategy is to stay in state court,” Schoenstein said. “It complicates the matter for him to be in two places.”
The split proceedings could create additional legal and logistical hurdles as both cases move forward.
What is the Wall Street sex scandal case?
The dispute centers on allegations by Rana, a former JPMorgan employee, that Hajdini subjected him to sexual abuse and coercive behavior while they worked at the banking giant.
Hajdini has denied the claims and maintains that Rana’s allegations are false. Her separate defamation lawsuit seeks damages over the accusations.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to NewsNation.